4.2 Review

Oxytocin in schizophrenia: a review of evidence for its therapeutic effects

Journal

ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 130-146

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5215.2011.00634.x

Keywords

brain; physiology; double-blind method; humans; intranasal; oxytocin; administration and dosage; schizophrenia; social perception

Funding

  1. NIMH [R34 MH091285]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MacDonald K, Feifel D. Oxytocin in schizophrenia: a review of evidence for its therapeutic effects. Background: The suggestion that the neurohormone oxytocin may have clinical application in the treatment of schizophrenia was first published in 1972. Since then, a considerable body of research on a variety of fronts including several recent double-blind treatment trials has buttressed these early reports, providing support for the assertion that the oxytocin system is a promising and novel therapeutic target for this devastating malady. Herein, we review the diverse, convergent lines of evidence supporting the therapeutic potential of oxytocin in psychotic illness. Methods: We performed a systematic review of preclinical and clinical literature pertaining to oxytocin's role in schizophrenia. Results: Multiple lines of evidence converge to support the antipsychotic potential of oxytocin. These include several animal models of schizophrenia, pharmacological studies examining the impact of antipsychotics on the oxytocin system, human trials in patients examining the aspects of the oxytocin system and several double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical treatment trials. Conclusions: There exists considerable, convergent evidence that oxytocin has potential as a novel antipsychotic with a unique mechanism of action. Auspiciously, based on the few chronic trials to date, its safety profile and tolerability appear very good. That said, several critical clinical questions await investigation before widespread use is clinically warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available