4.6 Article

Differences in aberrant expression and splicing of sarcomeric proteins in the myotonic dystrophies DM1 and DM2

Journal

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
Volume 119, Issue 4, Pages 465-479

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-010-0637-6

Keywords

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1); Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2); Skeletal muscle; Aberrant splicing; Microarray expression profiling

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, NIH [AR48171]
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Association USA
  3. Kleberg Foundation
  4. Folkhalsan Research Foundation
  5. Liv & Halsa Foundation
  6. Vasa Central Hospital District Medical Research funds
  7. Kung Gustav V Adolfs och Drottning Victorias minnesfond Foundation
  8. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016672] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR048171] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aberrant transcription and mRNA processing of multiple genes due to RNA-mediated toxic gain-of-function has been suggested to cause the complex phenotype in myotonic dystrophies type 1 and 2 (DM1 and DM2). However, the molecular basis of muscle weakness and wasting and the different pattern of muscle involvement in DM1 and DM2 are not well understood. We have analyzed the mRNA expression of genes encoding muscle-specific proteins and transcription factors by microarray profiling and studied selected genes for abnormal splicing. A subset of the abnormally regulated genes was further analyzed at the protein level. TNNT3 and LDB3 showed abnormal splicing with significant differences in proportions between DM2 and DM1. The differential abnormal splicing patterns for TNNT3 and LDB3 appeared more pronounced in DM2 relative to DM1 and are among the first molecular differences reported between the two diseases. In addition to these specific differences, the majority of the analyzed genes showed an overall increased expression at the mRNA level. In particular, there was a more global abnormality of all different myosin isoforms in both DM1 and DM2 with increased transcript levels and a differential pattern of protein expression. Atrophic fibers in DM2 patients expressed only the fast myosin isoform, while in DM1 patients they co-expressed fast and slow isoforms. However, there was no increase of total myosin protein levels, suggesting that aberrant protein translation and/or turnover may also be involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available