4.6 Article

Distinct pathological subtypes of FTLD-FUS

Journal

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 207-218

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-010-0764-0

Keywords

Frontotemporal dementia; Frontotemporal lobar degeneration; Fused in sarcoma; Atypical frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitinated inclusions; Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease; Basophilic inclusion body disease

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [74580]
  2. Pacific Alzheimer Research Foundation
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GI0704]
  4. Stavros-Niarchos Foundation
  5. Synapsis Foundation
  6. German Brain Bank BrainNet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most cases of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are characterized by abnormal intracellular accumulation of either tau or TDP-43 protein. However, in similar to 10% of cases, composed of a heterogenous collection of uncommon disorders, the molecular basis remains to be uncertain. We recently discovered that the pathological changes in several tau/TDP-43-negative FTLD subtypes are immunoreactive (ir) for the fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein. In this study, we directly compared the pattern of FUS-ir pathology in cases of atypical FTLD-U (aFTLD-U, N = 10), neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease (NIFID, N = 5) and basophilic inclusion body disease (BIBD, N = 8), to determine whether these are discrete entities or represent a pathological continuum. All cases had FUS-ir pathology in the cerebral neocortex, hippocampus and a similar wide range of subcortical regions. Although there was significant overlap, each group showed specific differences that distinguished them from the others. Cases of aFTLD-U consistently had less pathology in subcortical regions. In addition, the neuronal inclusions in aFTLD-U usually had a uniform, round shape, whereas NIFID and BIBD were characterized by a variety of inclusion morphologies. In all cases of aFTLD-U and NIFID, vermiform neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NII) were readily identified in the hippocampus and neocortex. In contrast, only two cases of BIBD had very rare NII in a single subcortical region. These findings support aFTLD-U, NIFID and BIBD as representing closely related, but distinct entities that share a common molecular pathogenesis. Although cases with overlapping pathology may exist, we recommend retaining the terms aFTLD-U, NIFID and BIBD for specific FTLD-FUS subtypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available