4.7 Article

A two-layer weight determination method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making experts in a linguistic environment

Journal

INFORMATION FUSION
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 156-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2014.05.001

Keywords

Complex multi-attribute large-group decision making (CMALGDM); Expert weight determination; 2-Tuple linguistic (2TL) representation model; Interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic (IV2TL) representation model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71102072, 70921001, 71172148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a two-layer weight determination model in a linguistic environment, when all the clustering results of the experts are known, to objectively obtain expert weights in complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making (CMALGDM) problems. The linguistic information considered in this paper involves both linguistic terms and linguistic intervals. We assume that, for CMALGDM problems, the final expert weights should be determined based on the expert weight in the cluster and on the cluster weights. This is mainly because experts in the same cluster will certainly make varying contributions to the cluster's overall consensus, and different clusters will also obtain the distinctive cluster information quality. Hence, a Minimized Variance Model and an Entropy Weight Model are proposed to determine the expert weights in the cluster and the cluster weights, respectively. We then synthesize these two types of weights into the final objective weights of the CMALGDM experts. The feasibility of the two-layer weight determination model method for the CMALGDM problems is illustrated using a case study of salary reform for professors at a university. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available