4.4 Article

Rathke's cleft cysts with significant squamous metaplasia-high risk of postoperative deterioration and close origins to craniopharyngioma

Journal

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
Volume 155, Issue 6, Pages 1069-1075

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1593-9

Keywords

Beta-catenin; Craniopharyngioma; Cytokeratin; Rathke's cleft cyst; Transition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC) with significant squamous and/or stratified epithelium including smooth transition from single cuboidal to squamous epithelium (tRCC) is rare and possibly represents an intermediate form to craniopharyngioma. Twelve patients with histologically confirmed tRCC were retrospectively investigated from a series of 167 cases of RCC and 96 cases of craniopharyngiomas. Clinical data were reviewed, and immunohistochemistry findings for cytokeratins and beta-catenin were examined. All lesions were located in the sella turcica with marked extension to suprasellar cistern. Six of the 12 patients had suffered postoperative re-enlargement, and three of these six patients required more than two additional operations and irradiation. CAM5.2 was positive in the glandular epithelium in all tRCCs and focally positive in the squamous epithelium of all these tRCCs. 34 beta E12 was positive in the squamous epithelium in all tRCCs and focally positive in the glandular epithelium in all but one tRCC. The findings of cytokeratin expression of tRCCs were very similar to those of craniopharyngioma. beta-Catenin showed nuclear translocation in five cases. All patients with nuclear translocation of beta-catenin suffered postoperative re-enlargement. tRCC carries an extremely high risk of re-enlargement. Cytokeratin expression resembles that in craniopharyngioma, which might indicate a very close origin of these pathologies. Nuclear translocation of beta-catenin may be related to the aggressive clinical course.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available