4.4 Review

The role of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases in stable systemic disease: a review of the literature

Journal

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
Volume 155, Issue 7, Pages 1321-1328

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-013-1701-5

Keywords

Brain metastases; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Whole-brain radiation therapy; KPS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Cancer patients with brain metastases display a median survival of only 1 to 2 months if left untreated. Although whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has lengthened median patient survival, the long-term neurotoxic effects of WBRT have become a deterrent to its use in the context of stable systemic disease. Therefore, it is important to identify patients who might benefit from stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in order to delay or avoid WBRT. Here we present a review of the literature to elucidate the role of SRS in patients with multiple brain metastases. Methods MEDLINE search for English-language articles from 1998 to 2012 describing survival or neurocognitive functioning of patients with multiple brain metastases treated with SRS, WBRT, or a combination. Results SRS monotherapy yields an equivalent survival with low risk of long-term neurotoxicity, but higher rate of recurrence, compared to WBRT or combined radiotherapy. Patients with <= 4 brain metastases or KPS >= 80 are expected to survive significantly longer than the onset time of prominent WBRT-induced neurocognitive decline. Conclusions SRS, administered alone or adjuvant to surgical resection of symptomatic metastases, is preferred for patients with <= 4 brain metastases or KPS >= 80 to delay or avoid WBRT. WBRT can then be employed in the event of recurrence. WBRT with or without resection is preferred for patients with >= 5 brain metastases and KPS<80, due to these patients' shorter survival and increased recurrence risk. SRS boost treatments can then be used in the event of poor tumor response or progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available