4.6 Review

Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews

Journal

INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 183-199

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008

Keywords

Literature review; Research synthesis; Typology; Evidence-based practice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article we develop a typology of review types and provide a descriptive insight into the most common reviews found in top IS journals. Our assessment reveals that the number of IS reviews has increased over the years. The majority of the 139 reviews are theoretical in nature, followed by narrative reviews, meta-analyses, descriptive reviews, hybrid reviews, critical reviews, and scoping reviews. Considering the calls for IS research to develop a cumulative tradition, we hope more review articles will be published in the future and encourage researchers who start a review to use our typology to position their contribution. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available