4.1 Article

Modification of an Internet-based patient education program for adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorder to suit adolescents with psychosis

Journal

INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 230-246

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2015.1008487

Keywords

patient education; Adolescent; mental health; Internet

Funding

  1. TEKES (The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation)
  2. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  3. Professor Pool
  4. University of Turku

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The overall goal of this study was to produce a user-friendly and high quality Internet-based patient education program for adolescents with psychosis. To achieve this, we ascertained the adolescents' and health care professionals' needs and expectations of patient education using Internet and the improvement proposals for an existing MentalNet program originally developed for adults with schizophrenia. Methods: The research process was conducted in two phases. First, adolescents' and healthcare professionals' needs for patient education and Internet were ascertained by interviewing adolescents and in two educational sessions with staff members (Phase I). Second, the preliminary evaluation of the Internet-based patient education program MentalNet was gathered from adolescents by an iterative process (see cyclic, recurring, repeating method), in one educational session with staff members and a questionnaire via email from other health care professionals (Phase II). Results: The needs and expectations of adolescents and health care professionals were related to the content, usability, design and realization of Internet-based patient education. Based on the information obtained the MentalNet program was modified to satisfy adolescents' needs. Discussion: The usefulness and effectiveness of the program will require scrutiny in future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available