4.0 Article

Tomographic structure of East Asia: II. Stagnant slab above 660 km discontinuity and its geodynamic implications

Journal

EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 613-626

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC CHINA & INST GEOPHYSICS, CHINA EARTHQUAKE ADMIN
DOI: 10.1007/s11589-010-0760-4

Keywords

tomography; stagnant slab; mantle wedge

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [B-11440134, S-12002006]
  2. postdoct grant of Peking University
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40125011, 90814002, 41074041]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [CX2-EW-QN102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P-wave arrival times of both regional and teleseismic earthquakes were inverted to obtain mantle structures of East Asia. No fast (slab) velocity anomalies was not find beneath the 660-km discontinuity through tomography besides a stagnant slab within the transition zone. Slow P-wave velocity anomalies are present at depths of 100-250 km below the active volcanic arc and East Asia. The western end of the flat stagnant slab is about 1 500 km west to active trench and may also be correlated with prominent surface topographic break in eastern China. We suggested that active mantle convection might be operating within this horizontally expanded mantle wedge above both the active subducting slabs and the stagnant flat slabs beneath much of the North China plain. Both the widespread Cenozoic volcanism and associated extensional basins in East Asia could be the manifestation of this vigorous upper mantle convection. Cold or thermal anomalies associated with the stagnant slabs above the 660-km discontinuity have not only caused a broad depression of the boundary due to its negative Clapeyron slope but also effectively shielded the asthenosphere and continental lithosphere above from any possible influence of mantle plumes in the lower mantle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available