4.5 Article

On new erosion models of Savage-Hutter type for avalanches

Journal

ACTA MECHANICA
Volume 199, Issue 1-4, Pages 181-208

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-007-0534-9

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ACI NIM [03318]
  2. ANR [ANR-06-BLAN-0414]
  3. Spanish Government Research [MTM2006-01275]
  4. IPGP [2292]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-BLAN-0414] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we study the modeling of one-dimensional avalanche flows made of a moving layer over a static base, where the interface between the two can be time dependent. We propose a general model, obtained by looking for an approximate solution with constant velocity profile to the incompressible Euler equations. This model has an energy dissipation equation that is consistent with the depth integrated energy equation of the Euler system. It has physically relevant steady state solutions, and, for constant slope, it gives a particular exact solution to the incompressible hydrostatic Euler equations. Then, we propose a simplified model, for which the energy conservation holds only up to third-order terms. Its associated eigenvalues depend on the mass exchange velocity between the static and moving layers. We show that a simplification used in some previously proposed models gives a non-consistent energy equation. Our models do not use, nor provide, any equation for the moving interface, thus other arguments have to be used in order to close the system. With special assumptions, and in particular small velocity, we can nevertheless obtain an equation for the evolution of the interface. Furthermore, the unknown parameters of the model proposed by Bouchaud et al. (J Phys Paris I 4,1383-1410, 1994) can be derived. For the quasi-stationary case we compare and discuss the equation for the moving interface with Khakhar's model (J Fluid Mech 441,225-264, 2001).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available