4.1 Article

Sing that tune Infants' perception of melody and lyrics and the facilitation of phonetic recognition in songs

Journal

INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 419-430

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.04.006

Keywords

Melody; Lyrics; Infant directed speech; Speech and song perception; Language acquisition; Infant music perception

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD037954-10, HD37954, P30 HD02274, P30 HD002274, R01 HD037954, P30 HD002274-41] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [T32 DC000033-20, P30 DC004661-10, T32 DC000033, P30 DC004661, P30 DC04661] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [T32 PA06468] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To better understand how infants process complex auditory input this study investigated whether 11-month-old infants perceive the pitch (melodic) or the phonetic (lyric) components within songs as more salient and whether melody facilitates phonetic recognition Using a preferential looking paradigm uni-dimensional and multi-dimensional songs were tested either the pitch or syllable order of the stimuli varied As a group Infants detected a change in pitch order in a 4-note sequence when the syllables were redundant (experiment 1) but did not detect the identical pitch change with variegated syllables (experiment 2) Infants were better able to detect a change in syllable order in a sung sequence (experiment 2) than the identical syllable change in a spoken sequence (experiment 1) These results suggest that by 11 months infants cannot ignore phonetic information in the context of perceptually salient pitch variation Moreover the increased phonetic recognition in song contexts mirrors findings that demonstrate advantages of infant-directed speech Findings are discussed in terms of how stimulus complexity interacts with the perception of sung speech in infancy (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available