4.2 Article

ETHNIC DIVERSITY, PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Journal

DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 473-495

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1049.2010.00116.x

Keywords

Natural resources; Growth; Fractionalization; Polarization; Property rights; C31; O11; O13

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Countries rich in natural resources constitute both development failures and successes depending on their underlying socioeconomic fundamentals. Recent empirical evidence and theoretical work provide support for a resource-curse hypothesis based on ethnic fractionalization. There is also increasing empirical evidence suggesting that ethnic heterogeneity based on polarization is a strong deterrent of economic growth. In this paper, we explore the interlinkages between natural resource abundance and both measures of ethnic heterogeneity. In a two-simultaneous equation system, we assess the effects of fractionalization and polarization on property-rights protection, and thereby on growth, both directly as well as in interaction with our resource-abundance proxy. We find that ethnic polarization is more likely to have a direct negative impact on the effectiveness of property rights in a resource-rich context, which as we explain may suggest that different ethnic groups treat the contestable resource base as a semi-public good.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available