4.7 Article

The five-parameter grain boundary character and energy distributions of a fully austenitic high-manganese steel using three dimensional data

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 281-289

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.038

Keywords

Grain boundary energy; Microstructure; TWIP steel; Electron backscattering diffraction; Focused ion beam

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Outside Study Program of Deakin University
  3. Carnegie Mellon from the ONR-MURI [N00014-11-10678]
  4. MRSEC program of the National Science Foundation [DMR-0520425]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The three-dimensional interfacial grain boundary network in a fully austenitic high-manganese steel was studied as a function of all five macroscopic crystallographic parameters (i.e. lattice misorientation and grain boundary plane normal) using electron backscattering diffraction mapping in conjunction with focused ion beam serial sectioning. The relative grain boundary area and energy distributions were strongly influenced by both the grain boundary plane orientation and the lattice misorientation. Grain boundaries terminated by (1 1 1) plane orientations revealed relatively higher populations and lower energies compared with other boundaries. The most frequently observed grain boundaries were {1 1 1} symmetric twist boundaries with the Sigma 3 misorientation, which also had the lowest energy. On average, the relative areas of different grain boundary types were inversely correlated to their energies. A comparison between the current result and previously reported observations (e.g. high-purity Ni) revealed that polycrystals with the same atomic structure (e.g. facecentered cubic) have very similar grain boundary character and energy distributions. (C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available