4.7 Article

On the growth of buckle-delamination pattern in compressed anisotropic thin films

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 37-46

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.041

Keywords

Buckling; Delamination; Telephone cord; Pattern

Funding

  1. Basic Research Program of China [2010CB934700, 2011CB302100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11072232, 11222219, 11132009]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2090050027]
  4. Advanced Engineering Programme and School of Engineering
  5. Monash University Malaysia [06-02-10SF0195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growth mechanisms of nonlinear buckle-delamination patterns from straight-sided to telephone cord and network-like blisters have been studied using a continuum modeling and simulation approach, which was extended to deal with cubic anisotropic elasticity in thin films. The buckling-delamination process is formulated using the time-dependent Ginzburg Landau kinetic equations, driven by minimizing the film substrate total free energy, including the elastic energies in both the film and the substrate, and the mixed-mode interfacial adhesion between them. It has been found that strong mixed-mode adhesion favored growth of telephone cord buckles via pinning of the buckle front, a sufficiently large biaxial compression caused branching of primary telephone cord buckles and an increase in the substrate compliance suppressed the undulation instability of the straight-sided blister tip. In addition, the compression anisotropy was found to dominate the oriented growth of the undulated blister. The good agreement between the details of simulated network-like blisters and those widely observed in experiments demonstrated that their formation was closely related to the above-mentioned mechanisms. (C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available