4.7 Article

Sintering of spherical particles of two immiscible phases controlled by surface and interphase boundary diffusion

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 61, Issue 7, Pages 2607-2616

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.040

Keywords

Sintering; Surface diffusion; Interface diffusion; Theory

Funding

  1. Center for Absorption in Science of the Ministry of Immigrant Absorption
  2. Committee for Planning and Budgeting of the Council for Higher Education under the framework of the KAMEA Program
  3. Jewish Communities of Germany Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a model of sintering of axisymmetrical particles of two immiscible, non-reacting phases controlled by self-diffusion along the particle surfaces and along the interphase boundary (IB) separating the particles. The model relies on a variational method of calculating the chemical potentials of the species diffusing along the IB, and on the explicit scheme of treating the displacements of the triple line where two surfaces and the IB meet. Our numerical results demonstrate that mutual wettability and relative size of the particles do not affect the shrinkage rate during the initial stages of sintering. At the final stages, better mutual wettability results in larger shrinkage. A large difference between the surface and IB diffusivities of two species results in transient morphologies of sintered particles which are very different both from the initial and the final configurations. Based on published data on the kinetics of sintering of three-particle W-Cu-W agglomerates [J.-S. Lee et al., Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 123-130], the self-diffusion coefficient of Cu along the Cu-W interface at 1000 degrees C was estimated at (3.3 +/- 0.8) x 10(-9) m(2) s(-1), which is comparable to the surface self-diffusion coefficient of Cu at the same temperature. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available