4.7 Article

Optimal precipitate shapes in nickel-base γ-γ′ alloys

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 1771-1783

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.008

Keywords

Ni-base superalloys; Gamma prime morphology; Moment invariants; Lattice misfit; Platinum group metals

Funding

  1. Iowa State University
  2. University of Pittsburgh
  3. Rolls-Royce PLC
  4. AFRL [FA8650-05-C-5220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precipitate shapes in nickel-base superalloys vary substantially with alloy composition, partitioning of elements to the disordered gamma matrix and the ordered gamma prime precipitates and the degree of coarsening during elevated temperature exposures. These shapes, which vary from spherical to cuboidal to rod-like, have typically not been quantified in Ni-base alloys containing relatively high gamma' volume fractions, in spite of their importance to mechanical properties. Precipitate shapes in a series of new platinum group metal (PGM)-containing Ni-base alloys have been quantified by their two-dimensional moment invariants. Precipitate morphologies were characterized in a total of 17 PGM-containing alloys in the solution treated and aged condition. The average gamma' volume fraction was measured as 0.60, typical of highly creep resistant Ni-base alloys. PGM additions resulted in an unusually large range of precipitate shapes. Precipitate morphologies were quantitatively analyzed using a shape parameter derived from the absolute moment invariant. For the compositions examined, the shape parameter reaches a maximum value at a precipitate matrix misfit magnitude of 0.4%. A large set of commercial single crystals exhibits the same range in shape parameter values around this misfit magnitude, suggesting that favorable high temperature properties are correlated with an optimum precipitate shape. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available