4.7 Article

Nonlinear driving force-velocity relationship for the migration of faceted boundaries

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 60, Issue 11, Pages 4531-4539

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.006

Keywords

Grain boundary migration; Boundary structure; Boundary faceting; Abnormal grain growth; Perovskites

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Korean government (MEST) [2011-0017556]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0017556] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A non-linear relationship between boundary migration and its driving force for faceted grain boundaries is demonstrated in a BaTiO3 model system using the solid-state single-crystal growth technique. BaTiO3 (0.4 mol.% TiO2) samples with different grain sizes were prepared by sintering powder compacts in H-2 for various times. Single-crystal seeds with {1 0 0} and {2 1 0} orientations were joined to the sintered samples and annealed in air for various times up to 20 h. During the air annealing, the matrix grain size did not change, indicating that the driving force for the growth of the single-crystal seeds remained constant. Under driving forces that exceeded a critical value, the seed crystals grew into the polycrystals. The critical driving force was lower and the growth rate was similar to 10 times higher for the {1 0 0} crystal compared with the {2 1 0} crystal. These results demonstrate the presence of a critical driving force for the migration of a faceted boundary and the remarkable effect of the crystallographic orientation on the boundary migration. The observed nonlinear migration behavior of faceted boundaries is similar to that of faceted solid/liquid interfaces. (C) 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available