4.7 Article

Crystallization process and thermal stability of Ge1Cu2Te3 amorphous thin films for use as phase change materials

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 872-880

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.048

Keywords

Sputtering; Differential scanning calorimetry; Amorphous materials; Semiconductor devices; Crystallization

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. KAKENHI [23360297]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [10J05810, 23360297] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystallization kinetics of amorphous Ge1Cu2Te3 (GCT) films prepared by sputter deposition were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry under non-isothermal conditions. An exothermic peak due to crystallization was observed in the temperature range 230-270 degrees C. It was found that the local activation energy for crystallization is almost constant when the crystallization fraction is less than about 0.15 and then monotonically decreases with increasing crystallization fraction, which indicates that the crystallization of amorphous GCT films is a multi-step mechanism. The local Avrami exponent decreased from more than 5 to 1.7 with increasing crystallization fraction. It was demonstrated by the Ozawa method that GCT amorphous films show a higher thermal stability than Ge2Sb2Te5 amorphous films, with an estimated failure time of over 70 years at 125 degrees C, which is well beyond the data retention requirements of the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. In addition, the thickness change in GCT amorphous films accompanying crystallization was measured by atomic force microscopy. The GCT amorphous film was found to show a thickness increase of only 2.0% on crystallization, which is desirable to enhance the endurance of phase change random access memory devices. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available