4.7 Article

Quantification of the microstructures of high purity nickel subjected to dynamic plastic deformation

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 1322-1333

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.035

Keywords

Quantification; Nickel; Dynamic plastic deformation; Strain rate; Convergent beam electron diffraction

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50911130230, 51171182]
  3. MOST [2010DFB54010]
  4. SRF for ROCS, SEM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quantitative microstructural analysis is presented for pure polycrystalline nickel processed by means of dynamic plastic deformation at high strain rates (10(2)-10(3) s(-1)) to strains from 0.3 to 2.9. This analysis covers a number of structural parameters, such as the spacing between and the misorientation angle across dislocation boundaries and high angle boundaries. These boundaries subdivide the structure on a finer and finer scale towards saturation at the highest strain. The structural evolution follows a hierarchical pattern from the formation of cells and cell blocks to a characteristic lamellar structure, which is similar to that observed in metals deformed at a low strain rate by conventional deformation processes. However, at a constant strain the increase in strain rate increases the dislocation density and reduces the distance between deformation-induced dislocation boundaries and high angle boundaries. Shear bands and twins have not been observed. In order to underpin the structural analysis, the mechanical properties as a function of strain have been determined by tensile and hardness tests. The flow stress is 850 MPa, showing that high strain rate deformation has potential as a method to produce strong nanostructured metals by imposing only a moderate strain. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available