4.7 Article

Atomic-scale simulation of screw dislocation/coherent twin boundary interaction in Al, Au, Cu and Ni

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 1456-1463

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.007

Keywords

Twin boundary; Dislocation; Plasticity; Molecular dynamics; In situ TEM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of material and choice of interatomic potential on the interaction between an a/2 < 1 1 0 >{1 1 1} screw dislocation and a Sigma 3{111} < 1 1 0 > coherent twin boundary (CTB) is determined by simulating this process in a range of face-centered cubic metals modeled with a total of 10 embedded-atom method (EAM) potentials. Generalized stacking fault energies are computed, showing a linear relation between the stacking faut (gamma(S)) and twin energies, as well as between the unstable stacking fault (gamma(US)) and unstable twinning (gamma(UT)) energies. We show that the reaction mechanism (absorption of the dislocation into the CTB or transmission into the twinned region) and reaction stress depend strongly on the potential used, even for a given material and are controlled by the material parameter gamma(S)/mu b(P) (where mu is the shear modulus and b(p) the Shockley partial Burgers vector), rather than the sign of the ratio (gamma(US) - gamma(S))/(gamma(UT) - gamma(S)), as proposed recently by Jin et al. [1]. Moreover, there exists a critical reaction stress, close to 400 MPa, independent of the potential, below which the dislocation is absorbed in the CTB and above which the dislocation is transmitted into the twinned region. The simulations are discussed with respect to in situ transmission electron microscopy straining experiments in Cu that highlight the importance of thermally activated cross-slip in the interaction process and show that transmission across a twin boundary is possible but is most likely an indirect process. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available