4.7 Article

In situ observations on creep fatigue fracture behavior of Sn-4Ag/Cu solder joints

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 59, Issue 15, Pages 6017-6028

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.010

Keywords

SnAg/Cu solder joints; Creep fatigue; In situ observation; Strain localization; Grain subdivision

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB631006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [50625103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The creep fatigue behavior of Sn-Ag/Cu solder joints was investigated in this study. Low-cycle creep fatigue tests were conducted on an in situ tensile stage, the deformation morphologies were observed by scanning electron microscopy and the microstructure of the solder was characterized using an electron back-scattered diffraction system. The results show that the creep fatigue process can be divided into three stages: a strain hardening stage, a steady deformation stage and an accelerating fracture stage. During the initial few cycles the strain increases rapidly because the solder is soft. After strain hardening of the solder becomes saturated, the strain increases approximately linearly with increasing cycles, strain concentration occurs in the solder close to the solder/Cu6Sn5 interface and initial microcracks are generated. When the microcracks evolve into long cracks, the failure accelerates and the specimens fracture at the interface shortly thereafter. The creep fatigue strain is contributed by plastic deformation and creep of the solder. Grain subdivision occurs in the solder when the plastic strain reaches a threshold, and then grain rotation takes place in the newly formed grains to accommodate further straining. Dislocation climb is the major creep mechanism, and grain boundary sliding can also be promoted after subdivision. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available