4.7 Article

Structure and motion of junctions between coherent and incoherent twin boundaries in copper

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 57, Issue 15, Pages 4454-4462

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.009

Keywords

Copper; Crystal structure; Interface migration; MD simulations; Twinning

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0506841, 0625299]
  2. Directorate For Engineering [0506841, 0625299] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0506841, 0625299] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The atomic mechanisms of twin boundary migration in copper under externally applied mechanical loads and during thermal annealing are investigated utilizing molecular dynamics computer simulations. The migration dynamics of the incoherent Sigma = 3 [1 1 0](1 1 2) twin boundary (ITB), pinned between two Sigma = 3[1 1 0](1 1 1) twin boundaries, is determined. A three-dimensional structural model is described for the junction between intersecting coherent and incoherent twin boundaries, and migration velocities are calculated under thermal annealing conditions. It is shown that the coherent twin boundary (CTB)/ITB junction results in breaking the crystal symmetry by creation of either an edge dislocation or a mixed (edge/screw) at the intersection. These two types of defects can lead to pronounced differences in the observed migration (and hence annealing) rates of ICT/CTB junctions. The annealing rate resulting from the migration of ITBs with a mixed dislocation is found to be more than twice that of the edge dislocation. The mechanism of ITB motion is shown to be governed by successive kink-like motion of neighboring atomic columns, each of which is shifted by 1/4[1 1 0], followed by structural relaxation to accommodate boundary motion. (C) 2009 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available