4.2 Article

Comparison of administration routes for adipose-derived stem cells in the treatment of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats

Journal

ACTA HISTOCHEMICA
Volume 116, Issue 6, Pages 1075-1084

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2014.05.002

Keywords

Adipose-derived stem cells; Ischemic stroke; Middle cerebral artery occlusion; Delivery route; Rat

Categories

Funding

  1. Youth Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region [2011211B31]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81373569]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given that adult adipose tissue is an abundant, accessible and safe source of stem cells, the use of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) provides a promising approach in ischemic stroke. The delivery route, however, for transplantation of ADSCs in clinical application remains controversial regarding the time window, cell type, safety issues, 'first pass' effect and therapeutic effect. To determine the optimal administration route in transplantation of ADSCs, we compared the therapeutic effect of the three mainly used administration routes of ADSCs in a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rat model. Cells isolated from the adipose tissue of adult rodents were differentiated and characterized in vitro, and further transplanted in vivo by intravenous, intra-arterial or intra-ventricular delivery. The infarct volume, expression of neurotrophic factors and the neurobehavioral improvements were evaluated after the equal dose of BrdU labeled ADSCs transplantation. Our results indicated that the equal dose of ADSCs delivered intravenously were effective in improving the neurological outcome and reducing the infarct volume after ischemic brain injury in long term duration in contrast to intra-arterial and intra-ventricular delivery. At 1-7 days after transplantation, the increased expression levels of BDNF, VEGF, bFGF, Bcl-2, IL-10 and decreased levels of caspase-3 and TNF-alpha in the intra-ventricular and intra-arterial groups were significant in contrast to the intravenous group. There was no significant difference among the three groups after 7 days. Our findings suggest that compared with the intra-ventricular delivery, intravascular injection allows higher dose injection with fewer invasions and appears to be optimal in application with regard to therapeutic efficacy, safety and feasibility. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available