4.0 Article

TG/HDL-C RATIO AS CARDIO-METABOLIC BIOMARKER EVEN IN NORMAL WEIGHT WOMEN

Journal

ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA-BUCHAREST
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 261-267

Publisher

EDITURA ACAD ROMANE
DOI: 10.4183/aeb.2018.261

Keywords

TG/HDL-C; Insulin Resistance; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Prediabetes

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [2013-01-201874]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Despite that the Triglycerides/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio has been associated with insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease, some outcomes differ between populations. Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between TG/HDL-C ratio and cardio-metabolic risk factors in both obese and normal weight women. Design. Cross sectional, from January to December of 2015. Subjects and Methods. Two hundred and fifty three women aged 40 to 60 years. Anthropometric and laboratory measurements were performed. Insulin resistance was measured by the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). All participants underwent a Doppler ultrasound to measure intima-media thickness of carotid artery (cIMT). Results. TG/HDL-C ratio correlated with body mass index (r=0.194, p=0.01), and visceral adipose tissue (r=0.193, p=0.002). Additionally, TG/HDL-C correlated with glucose (r=0.367, p=0.001), insulin (r=0.354, p=0.001) and HOMA-IR (r=0.396 p=0.001). TG/HDL-C was associated with prediabetes, Odds Ratio (OR) was 1.83 (95%CI 1.07-3.13) and insulin resistance 3.27 (95%CI 1.78-6.01), and this risk remains in normal weight women 4.7 (95%CI 1.2-17.81) for prediabetes and 4.38 (95%CI 1.42-13.84) for insulin resistance. No significant risk for cIMT. Conclusion. A TG/HDL-C ratio >= 3.0 is a potential risk factor for prediabetes and insulin resistance in women 40-60 years, even in normal weight women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available