3.8 Article

Amazonian agriculturalists bound by subsistence hunting

Journal

JOURNAL OF CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 99-121

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08873631.2011.548482

Keywords

subsistence hunting; conflict; cohesion; caboclo; Amazon; Projecto de Desenvolvimento Sustentavel (PDS) Sao Salvador

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [6391954]
  2. Working Forests in the Tropics Small Grants Competition at the University of Florida

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As rural Amazonian caboclo households transition from subsistence to increasingly market-based economies with systems of individualized production and consumption, the non-market exchanges of cooperative labor and game meat integral to the practice of subsistence hunting maintain bonds between households in the community. Further, subsistence hunting strengthens kinship ties across households wherein both men and women are important actors, an additional important component of local resource management. This study conducted in Brazil's first sustainable development settlement, Projecto de Desenvolvimento Sustentavel (PDS) Sao Salvador, suggests that not only are use rules important in the local management of natural resources, but also that inter-household relations of social conflict and social cohesion expressed in subsistence hunting reinforce community social structure while simultaneously impacting the natural resource base. In the effort to link social with ecological sustainability, conservation and development planners must recognize that extra-community government regulation may interfere with the socio-cultural dynamics of local community identity and governance explicit in subsistence hunting in rural Amazonian coboclo communities and could potentially produce negative consequences for community social structure and the natural environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available