4.7 Article

Dying methods affect the aroma of Origanum majorana L. analyzed by GC-MS and descriptive sensory analysis

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 218-227

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.067

Keywords

Essential oil; Aromatic herbs; Sabinene; Hot air drying; Vacuum-microwave drying

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N312 031 32/2036, N N310 146835]
  2. Cooperativa Agricola Catalica de Orihuela Sdad. Coop. [UMH 84/2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drying is a useful option to extend the shelf life of marjoram (Origanum majorana L.), which is a widely used as herb. The influence of drying method on the quality of marjoram aroma was evaluated. The drying methods tested were: convective drying (CD), vacuum-microwave (VM) drying, and a combination of convective pre-drying and VM finish-drying (VMFD). Marjoram's CD kinetics was described by a logarithmic model, while vacuum-microwave drying kinetics was described by Page model. VMFD drying kinetics followed the model of Henderson and Pabis. Volatile compounds of marjoram samples were extracted by hydrodistillation and analyzed by gas chromatography. Thirty three compounds were tentatively identified and quantified, with cis-sabinene hydrate (229 mg 100 g(-1) dry basis, db) and terpinen-4-ol (169 mg 100 g(-1) db) being the major components. The total concentration of volatiles of fresh marjoram (825 mg 100 g(-1) db) was reduced by most of the drying treatments, except for the treatments VMD at 240 and 360W. The VMD method at 240W was the best option for drying mad oram followed by the combined method with 50 degrees C and 240 or 360W; the drying times were relatively short (approximate to 162 and 158 min, respectively), and aroma quality was good according to instrumental data (total concentration of volatiles) and sensory evaluation results (high scores of fresh and vegetable odor). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available