3.9 Article

Screening and Characterization of High-Affinity ssDNA Aptamers against Anthrax Protective Antigen

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 266-271

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1087057110391787

Keywords

aptamer; protective antigen; ELISA; Bacillus anthracis; anthrax

Funding

  1. Hanyang University [HYU-2008-5]
  2. Rural Development Administration, the Republic of Korea [20080401034006]
  3. Baylor University
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2011-000-10010-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The protective antigen (PA) of Bacillus anthracis is a secreted protein that functions as a critical virulence factor. Protective antigen has been selected as a biomarker in detecting bacterial infection. The in vitro selection method, systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX), was used to find single-stranded DNAs that were tightly bound to PA. After 8 rounds of the SELEX process with PA, 4 different oligonucleotides (referred to as aptamers) that contain a 30-residue ssDNA sequence were identified. Dissociation constant (K-d) values with Cy3-attached aptamers were determined via fluorophotometry to be within a nanomolar range. The authors attempted to visualize the detection of PA using an aptamer-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, which has proven to be successful within a nanomolar K-d value range. Furthermore, 2 of the 4 aptamers exhibited specificity to PA against bovine serum albumin and bovine serum. The results of this study demonstrate the analytical potential of an oligonucleotide-based biosensor for a wide variety of applications, particularly in diagnosing disease through specific protein biomarkers. (Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2011;16:266-271)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available