4.7 Article

NKp46 defines ovine cells that have characteristics corresponding to NK cells

Journal

VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-37

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VTRI initiative of the UK Department for Food and Rural Affairs
  2. Scottish Higher Education Funding Council
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/05201234] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/05201234] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural killer (NK) cells are well recognized as playing a key role in innate immune defence through cytokine production and cytotoxic activity; additionally recent studies have identified several novel NK cell functions. The ability to study NK cells in the sheep has been restricted due to a lack of specific reagents. We report the generation of a monoclonal antibody specific for ovine NKp46, a receptor which in a number of mammals is expressed exclusively in NK cells. Ovine NKp46(+) cells represent a population that is distinct from CD4(+) and gamma delta(+) T-cells, B-cells and cells of the monocytic lineage. The NKp46(+) cells are heterogenous with respect to expression of CD2 and CD8 and most, but not all, express CD16 - characteristics consistent with NK cell populations in other species. We demonstrate that in addition to populations in peripheral blood and secondary lymphoid organs, ovine NKp46(+) populations are also situated at the mucosal surfaces of the lung, gastro-intestinal tract and non-gravid uterus. Furthermore, we show that purified ovine NKp46(+) populations cultured in IL-2 and IL-15 have cytotoxic activity that could be enhanced by ligation of NKp46 in re-directed lysis assays. Therefore we conclude that ovine NKp46(+) cells represent a population that by phenotype, tissue distribution and function correspond to NK cells and that NKp46 is an activating receptor in sheep as in other species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available