4.3 Article

Effect of pre-treatment nutritional status, folate and vitamin B12 levels on induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

INDIAN PEDIATRICS
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 385-389

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13312-015-0642-x

Keywords

Acute leukemia; Nutrition; Outcome; Protein energy malnutrition; Vitamin deficiency

Categories

Funding

  1. Uttar Pradesh Council of Science and Technology
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate pre-treatment undernutrition, and folate and B12 deficiency in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and their correlation with complications and outcome of induction chemotherapy. Observational study. Tertiary care teaching hospital in Northern India. 50 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Children were assessed for nutritional status (Weight for age Z-score, serum albumin, folate and B12) at presentation, and were followed-up during induction for bone marrow response, counts and outcome. Folate and B12 were repeated twice at monthly intervals after induction. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to determine the association of nutritional parameters with the outcome variables. Baseline undernutrition was observed in 66%, hypoalbuminemia in 32.6%, folate deficiency in 41.3% and B12 deficiency in 36.9% of included children. Significant decline in folate levels was noted on serial assays during chemotherapy (P=0.001). Folate deficient children had higher risk for delayed marrow recovery and counts on day 14 (P=0.007 and P=0.001). Hypoalbuminemia (P=0.04), B12 deficiency (P=0.001) and folate (P=0.03) deficiency were associated with toxic deaths during induction. Baseline nutritional deficiencies negatively influence the outcome and occurrence of complications during induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available