4.4 Article

Spatial dependence and mitigation of radiation damage by a line-focus mini-beam

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444910036875

Keywords

radiation damage; line focus; mini-beams

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [0650547]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. US DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  4. NSF
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0650547] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, strategies to reduce primary radiation damage have been proposed which depend on focusing X-rays to dimensions smaller than the penetration depth of excited photoelectrons. For a line focus as used here the penetration depth is the maximum distance from the irradiated region along the X-ray polarization direction that the photoelectrons penetrate. Reported here are measurements of the penetration depth and distribution of photoelectron damage excited by 18.6 keV photons in a lysozyme crystal. The experimental results showed that the penetration depth of similar to 17.35 keV photoelectrons is 1.5 +/- 0.2 mu m, which is well below previous theoretical estimates of 2.8 mu m. Such a small penetration depth raises challenging technical issues in mitigating damage by line-focus mini-beams. The optimum requirements to reduce damage in large crystals by a factor of 2.0-2.5 are Gaussian line-focus mini-beams with a root-mean-square width of 0.2 mu m and a distance between lines of 2.0 mu m. The use of higher energy X-rays (> 26 keV) would help to alleviate some of these requirements by more than doubling the penetration depth. It was found that the X-ray dose has a significant contribution from the crystal's solvent, which initially contained 9.0%(w/v) NaCl. The 15.8 keV photoelectrons of the Cl atoms and their accompanying 2.8 keV local dose from the decay of the resulting excited atoms more than doubles the dose deposited in the X-ray-irradiated region because of the much greater cross-section and higher energy of the excited atom, degrading the mitigation of radiation damage from 2.5 to 2.0. Eliminating heavier atoms from the solvent and data collection far from heavy-atom absorption edges will significantly improve the mitigation of damage by line-focus mini-beams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available