Journal
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION B-STRUCTURAL SCIENCE CRYSTAL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 491-496Publisher
INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S0108768108015437
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The occurrence, geometries and energies of hydrogen bonds from N-H and O-H donors to the S acceptors of thiourea derivatives, thioamides and thiones are compared with data for their O analogues - ureas, amides and ketones. Geometrical data derived from the Cambridge Structural Database indicate that hydrogen bonds to the C=S acceptors are much weaker than those to their C=O counterparts: van der Waals normalized hydrogen bonds to O are shorter than those to S by similar to 0.25 angstrom. Further, the directionality of the approach of the hydrogen bond with respect to S, defined by the C=S center dot center dot center dot H angle, is in the range 102-109 degrees, much lower than the analogous C=O center dot center dot center dot H angle which lies in the range 127-140 degrees. Ab initio calculations using intermolecular perturbation theory show good agreement with the experimental results: the differences in hydrogen-bond directionality are closely reproduced, and the interaction energies of hydrogen bonds to S are consistently weaker than those to O, by similar to 12 kJ mol(-1), for each of the three compound classes. There are no CSD examples of hydrogen bonds to aliphatic thiones, (Csp(3))(2)C=S, consistent with the near-equality of the electronegativities of C and S. Thioureas and thioamides have electron-rich N substituents replacing the Csp(3) atoms. Electron delocalization involving C=S and the N lone pairs then induces a significant >C delta+=S delta- dipole, which enables the formation of the medium-strength C=S center dot center dot center dot H bonds observed in thioureas and thioamides.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available