4.1 Article

Mechanical properties of radial bone defects treated with autogenous graft covered with hydroxyapatite in rabbit

Journal

ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 256-259

Publisher

ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-86502012000300009

Keywords

Transplantation; Autologous; Bone; Durapatite; Rabbits

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Research Branch of Tehran, Islamic Azad University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To determine biomechanical property of autogenous bone graft covered with hydroxyapatite in the defect of radial bone in rabbit. METHODS: Eighteen adult male New Zealand white rabbits were used which were divided into three groups (I, II, III) of six rabbits each. A segmental bone defect of 10 mm in length was created in the middle of the right radial shaft under general effective anesthesia in all rabbits and were stabilized using mini-plate with four screws. The defects In group I were left as such without filler, whereas in group II the defect were filled up with harvested 10 mm rib bone and in group III the defect were packed with rib bone covered with nano-hydroxyapatite. All rabbits in three groups were divided into two subgroups (one month and three months duration with three rabbits in each one). RESULTS: The mechanical property and the mean load for fracturing normal radial bone was recorded 388.2 +/- 6 N whereas it was 72.4 +/- 12.8 N for group I in 1 month duration which was recorded 182.4 +/- 14.2 N for group II and 211.6 +/- 10.4 N for group III at the end of 1 month. These values were 97.6 +/- 10.2 N for group I and 324.6 +/- 8.2 N for group II and 372.6 +/- 17.4 N for group III at the end of three months after implantation. CONCLUSION: Implantation of autologous graft covered with hydroxyapatite indicated to have positive effect in integral formation of qualitative callus at the site of fracture and early re-organization of callus to regain mechanical strength too.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available