4.1 Article

Ecological aspects of the tent building process by Ectophylla alba (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

Journal

ACTA CHIROPTEROLOGICA
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 365-372

Publisher

MUSEUM & INST ZOOLOGY PAS-POLISH ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3161/150811011X624839

Keywords

tent-roosting bats; Ectophylla alba; tents; Heliconia

Categories

Funding

  1. American Society of Mammalogists
  2. Organization for Tropical Studies
  3. Tirimbina Biological Reserve
  4. Rufford Foundation
  5. Scott Neotropical Fund of Cleveland Metroparks Zoo and Cleveland Zoological Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twenty-two species of bats worldwide arc known to use modified leaves as their roost, known as 'tents'. It has been suggested that the mating system of these species is resource-defense polygyny, with the presumably male-constructed tent serving as an attractant of females, but in Ectophylla alba a female was observed building a tent. The objectives of this work were to determine: 1) if both sexes build the tent; 2) if there is a relationship between number of tents and mating seasons and 3) the time availability of the Heliconia leaves that this species uses to makes its roost as well as the effect of the bats on the plant. The study site was the Tirimbina Biological Reserve, Sarapiqui, Costa Rica. During 53 weeks, we censused the tents of E. alba in nine hectares. Construction of tents was filmed with a video camera and infrared lights. To measure the average life of the tents and the leaves that had not been modified, we marked leaves that were visited weekly to monitor for deterioration. Our results show that both females and males construct tents. Roost construction is costly in terms of time and effort, so the bats maximize the time spent occupying the tent. The modifications that the bats make to the leaves considerably reduce the lifetime of the leaves. This has implications for both the plant used and for the bats that build the tents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available