Journal
ACTA CHIROPTEROLOGICA
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 231-245Publisher
MUSEUM & INST ZOOLOGY PAS-POLISH ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.3161/150811010X504725
Keywords
Anabat; echolocation; habitat use; identification keys; monitoring; regional variation
Categories
Funding
- Australian Biological Resources Study
- NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Accurate and efficient identification of bat (Microchiroptera) echolocation calls has been hampered by poor knowledge of the intraspecific variability in calls (including regional variation), a lack of call parameters for use in separating species and the amount of time required to manually identify individual calls or call sequences We constructed and tested automated bat call identification keys for three regions in New South Wales, Australia, using over 4,000 reference calls in approximate to 300 call sequences per region. We used the program AnaScheme to extract time, frequency and shape parameters from calls recorded with the Anabat system Classification trees were built to separate species using these parameters and provided the decision rules for construction of the keys An 'Unknown' category was included in the keys for sequences that could not be confidently identified to species The reliability of the keys was tested automatically with AnaScheme, using independent sets of reference call sequences, and keys were refined before further testing on additional test sequences Regional keys contained 18-19 species or included species groups We report rates of sequence misidentification (accuracy) and correct identification (detection) relative to all sequences (including 'unknowns') used to test each version of a key. Refined versions of the keys were accurate, with total misidentification rates of 0 5-5 3% for the three regions Additionally, total correct identifications for regions were 56-75% (>= 50% for most species), an overall high rate of detection. When 'unknowns' were ignored, as is common in many published studies, correct identification for regions increased to 91-99%, rates which compare favourably to the most successful classifiers tested to date The future use of AnaScheme for automated bat call identification is promising, especially for the large-scale temporal and spatial acoustic sampling to which Anabat is particularly suited
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available