4.5 Article

Effects of different modes of exercise on appetite and appetite-regulating hormones

Journal

APPETITE
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 26-33

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.017

Keywords

Rope skipping exercise; Hunger; Up-and-down motions; Ghrelin; Peptide YY

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [23650439]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23650439] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study determined the changes in appetite and appetite-regulating gut hormones during and following bouts of both rope skipping exercise (weight-bearing) and bicycle ergometer exercise (non-weight-bearing). After a 12-h fast, 15 young men (mean SD, age 24.4 +/- 1.7 yrs, maximal oxygen uptake 47.0 +/- 6.5 mL/kg/min) participated in three 160 min trials: (1) rope skipping exercise (295 +/- 40 kcal, 3 sets x 10 min with 5-min interval, then rested for 120 min); (2) bicycle ergometer exercise (288 +/- 36 kcal, 3 sets x 10 min with 5-min interval, then rested for 120 min); (3) control (rested for 160 min). Ratings of perceived hunger and acylated ghrelin were suppressed and total peptide YY (PYY) were increased during and immediately after exercise in both exercise trials, but glucagon liked peptide-1 was not changed. Furthermore, suppressed hunger during rope skipping exercise was greater than that during bicycle ergometer exercise, but there were no differences in acylated ghrelin and total PYY. These results indicate that weight-bearing exercise has a greater exercise-induced appetite suppressive effect compared with non-weight-bearing exercise, and both forms of exercise lowered acylated ghrelin and increased total PYY, but the changes did not differ significantly between exercise modes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available