4.7 Article

Accretion-induced luminosity spreads in young clusters: evidence from stellar rotation

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 413, Issue 1, Pages L56-L60

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01032.x

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; protoplanetary discs; planetary systems; stars: pre-main-sequence

Funding

  1. RCUK
  2. STFC [PP/D000955/1, PP/F000057/1, ST/J000035/1, ST/G002355/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G002355/1, ST/J000035/1, PP/D000955/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an analysis of the rotation of young stars in the associations Cepheus OB3b, NGC 2264, 2362 and the Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC). We discover a correlation between rotation rate and position in a colour-magnitude diagram (CMD) such that stars which lie above an empirically determined median pre-main sequence rotate more rapidly than stars which lie below this sequence. The same correlation is seen, with a high degree of statistical significance, in each association studied here. If position within the CMD is interpreted as being due to genuine age spreads within a cluster, then the stars above the median pre-main sequence would be the youngest stars. This would in turn imply that the most rapidly rotating stars in an association are the youngest, and hence those with the largest moments of inertia and highest likelihood of ongoing accretion. Such a result does not fit naturally into the existing picture of angular momentum evolution in young stars, where the stars are braked effectively by their accretion discs until the disc disperses. Instead, we argue that, for a given association of young stars, position within the CMD is not primarily a function of age, but of accretion history. We show that this hypothesis could explain the correlation we observe between rotation rate and position within the CMD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available