4.5 Article

Eating behaviour, insulin resistance and cluster of metabolic risk factors in European adolescents. The HELENA Study

Journal

APPETITE
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 140-147

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.011

Keywords

Food behaviour; Food preferences; Insulin resistance; Metabolic risk factors; Adolescents

Funding

  1. European Community [FOOD-CT-2005-007034]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [JCI-2010-07055]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Health: Maternal, Child Health and Development Network [RD08/0072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study examined the associations of food behaviours and preferences with markers of insulin resistance and clustered metabolic risk factors score after controlling for potential confounders, including body fat in European adolescents. A cross-sectional study Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence Cross-Sectional Study of 3546 European adolescents aged 12.5-17.5 years was conducted, using a complete dataset on at least glucose, insulin and Food Choice Questionnaire. Results indicated skipping breakfast, as well as the preference of some foods such as nuts, chocolate, burgers and pizzas, soft drinks or juices, explain part of homeostasis model assessment index variance. In addition, snacking regularly during school day is associated with higher metabolic risk score in females. In conclusion, the present findings suggest that intervention studies aimed to prevent insulin resistance and metabolic risk factors in youth should focus not only in influencing food and drink preferences, but also to ensure healthy food behaviour in-adolescents. The harmful consequences in the choice of certain foods or drinks and food habits can be countered with proper planning and intervention programs to prevent insulin resistance and metabolic risk factors. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available