4.5 Article

Texture, not flavor, determines expected satiation of dairy products

Journal

APPETITE
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 635-641

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.008

Keywords

Sensory attributes; Food intake; Satiation; Means of consumption; Eating behavior

Funding

  1. Top Institute Food and Nutrition
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G005443/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/G005443/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consumers' expectations about the satiating capacity of a food may differ markedly across a broad range of food products, but also between foods within one product category. Our objective is to investigate the role of sensory attributes and means of consumption in the expected satiation of dairy products. In three independent experiments we measured the expected satiation of (1) commercially available yogurts and custards (29 adults, age: 26 +/- 5 y, BMI: 22.9 +/- 2.4 kg/m(2)); (2) lemon- and meringue-flavored custards with different textures (30 adults, age: 23 +/- 4 y, BMI: 22.1 +/- 2.1 kg/m(2)); and (3) chocolate milk and chocolate custard consumed with either a straw or a spoon (30 adults, age: 20 +/- 2.2 y, BMI: 21.5 +/- 2.2 kg/m(2)); all based on a single mouthful. Expected satiation was linked to the product's perceived characteristics. We observed an effect of texture (p < 0.0001), but not of flavor on expected satiation (p = 0.98) in Experiment 2; and an effect of texture (p < 0.0001). but not of means of consumption on expected satiation (p = 0.63) in Experiment 3. Thickness was positively correlated with expected satiation in Experiment 1 (r = 0.45; p < 0.001) and Experiment 2 (r = 0.54; p < 0.001). Expected satiation of dairy products increased consistently with increasing thickness; flavor characteristics or means of consumption as tested did not change expected satiation effects. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available