4.8 Article

Organic interlamellar layers, mesolayers and mineral nanobridges: Contribution to strength in abalone (Haliotis rufescence) nacre

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 2056-2064

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.016

Keywords

Nacre; Mesolayers; Organic constituent; Red abalone; Mineral bridges

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 1006931]
  2. Ford Foundation Pre-Doctoral Fellowship
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1006931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The contributions of mesolayers, organic interlamellar layers and nanoasperities/mineral bridges to the strength of nacre from red abalone (Hallotis rufescens) shell nacre are investigated. Samples were demineralized and deproteinized to separate the organic and mineral components, respectively. Tensile tests were performed on both the isolated organic constituent and the isolated mineral. The strength of the isolated organic component suggests that growth bands play an important role in the mechanical behavior as they are thick regions of protein that are a significant fraction (similar to 0.4) of the total organic content. The thickness variation of the nacre tablets was measured and found to be a small fraction of the mean tablet thickness (0.568 mu m); the standard deviation is 26 nm, indicating that the wedge mechanism of toughening does not operate in the nacre investigated. Results obtained from the isolated mineral validate the importance of the organic constituent as the mechanical properties decline greatly when the organic component is removed. The results presented herein add to the understanding of the mechanical response of the organic interlayers and growth bands and their effect on the toughness of the abalone nacre. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available