4.8 Article

Amphiphilic peptide-loaded nanofibrous calcium phosphate microspheres promote hemostasis in vivo

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 9194-9200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.023

Keywords

Amphipathic peptide; Amphiphile nanofiber; Microsphere; Trauma; Hemorrhage

Funding

  1. Canadian Haemophilia Society
  2. Canada Research Chairs
  3. NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most fatalities from trauma occur due to severe blood loss. There is a need for improved hemostatic biomaterials that can address this problem. The aim of this study was to determine the in vivo efficacy of nanofibrous microspheres (NFM) loaded with hemostatic peptides, specifically ideal amphipathic peptides (IAP) that have been demonstrated to possess both procoagulant and antifibrinolyic activities. We demonstrate that IAP can be coupled to NFM (IAP-NFM) to form matrices that exhibit substantial hemostatic activity. IAP-NFM matrices were compared to a commercial zeolitic hemostatic biomaterial (QuikClot) and have superior efficacy in reducing bleeding in vivo. In both a murine tail transection and a murine hepatic injury model, bleeding times were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) with the use of IAP-NFM as compared with equal masses of either QuikClot or NFM alone, or no treatment. Importantly, histological examination revealed no tissue injury when IAP-NFM or NFM were applied to hepatic lacerations. In contrast, QuikClot caused widespread hepatocyte degeneration and necrosis, with higher average injury zone thickness as determined by semiquantitative analysis. In summary, NFM was able to maintain the pro-coagulant properties of IAP in our preclinical model, caused no observable tissue damage at the site of application and had better performance than QuikClot controls. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available