4.8 Article

Carboxymethylation of ulvan and chitosan and their use as polymeric components of bone cements

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 9086-9097

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.036

Keywords

Ulvan; Chitosan; Carboxymethylation; Glass-ionomers; Bone cements

Funding

  1. European Union [REGPOT-CT2012-31633-PO-LARIS]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal)
  3. European Union
  4. QREN
  5. FEDER
  6. COMPETE [PEst-C/QUI/UI0062/2011]
  7. FCT [SFRH/BPD/39333/2007, SFRH/BPD/46584/2008]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/46584/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ulvan, extracted from the green algae Ulva lactuca, and chitosan, extracted from Loligo forbesis squid-pen, were carboxymethylated, yielding polysaccharides with an average degree of substitution of similar to 98% (carboxymethyl ulvan, CMU) and similar to 87% (carboxymethyl chitosan, N,O-CMC). The carboxymethylation was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and quantified by conductimetric titration and H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance. The average molecular weight increased with the carboxymethylation (chitosan, M-n 145 -> 296 kDa and M-w, 227 -> 416 kDa; ulvan, M-n, 139 -> 261 kDa and M-w 368 -> 640 kDa), indicating successful chemical modifications. Mixtures of the modified polysaccharides were tested in the formulation of polyacrylic acid-free glass-ionomer bone cements. Mechanical and in vitro bioactivity tests indicate that the inclusion of CMU in the cement formulation, i.e. 0.50:0.50 N,O-CMC:CMU, enhances its mechanical performance (compressive strength 52.4 +/- 8.0 MPa and modulus 23 +/- 0.3 GPa), generates non-cytotoxic cements and induces the diffusion of Ca and/or P-based moieties from the surface to the bulk of the cements. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available