4.8 Article

Corrosion fatigue behaviors of two biomedical Mg alloys-AZ91D and WE43-In simulated body fluid

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages 4605-4613

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.026

Keywords

Fatigue; Corrosion fatigue; Magnesium alloy; Biomedical metallic materials

Funding

  1. Research Funds for the Central Universities [PKUJC2009001]
  2. Foundation of Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing Technology, Ministry of Education [2008001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30670560]
  4. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [2082010]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-07-0033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium alloys have been recently developed as biodegradable implant materials, yet there has been no study concerning their corrosion fatigue properties under cyclic loading. In this study the die-cast AZ91D (A for aluminum 9%, Z for zinc 1% and D for a fourth phase) and extruded WE43 (W for yttrium 4%, E for rare earth mischmetal 3%) alloys were chosen to evaluate their fatigue and corrosion fatigue behaviors in simulated body fluid (SBF). The die-cast AZ91D alloy indicated a fatigue limit of 50 MPa at 10(7) cycles in air compared to 20 MPa at 10(6) cycles tested in SBF at 37 degrees C. A fatigue limit of 110 MPa at 10(7) cycles in air was observed for extruded WE43 alloy compared to 40 MPa at 10(7) cycles tested in SBF at 37 degrees C. The fatigue cracks initiated from the micropores when tested in air and from corrosion pits when tested in SBF, respectively. The overload zone of the extruded WE43 alloy exhibited a ductile fracture mode with deep dimples, in comparison to a brittle fracture mode for the die-cast AZ91D. The corrosion rate of the two experimental alloys increased under cyclic loading compared to that in the static immersion test. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available