4.8 Article

Characterization of calcium phosphate cements modified by addition of amorphous calcium phosphate

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 617-625

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.038

Keywords

Calcium phosphate cement; Cell viability; Crystallinity; Microstructure

Funding

  1. Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds of Ghent University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study the influence of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) on the setting of, and the formed apatite crystallite size in, a calcium phosphate cement (CPC) based on alpha-tricalcium phosphate (alpha-TCP) or tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP)/monocalcium phosphate monohydrate (MCPM) was investigated. Setting times at 22 degrees C were measured in air atmosphere; those at 37 degrees C were measured at 100% relative humidity. The phase composition of the set cements was investigated after 1 week using X-ray diffractometry and infrared spectroscopy and the morphology was investigated using scanning electron microscopy. The compressive strength (CS) of the set CPCs was measured after I day. Viability of MC3T3-E1 cells on the CPCs was analyzed after 7, 14 and 21 days of incubation using the CeIlTiter 96 (R) Aqueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay. The alpha-TCP-based cement exhibited long setting times, a high CS and was converted to a calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHAp). The TTCP/MCPM-based CPC was only partly converted to CDHAp, produced acceptable setting times and had a low CS. Addition of ACP to these two CPCs resulted in cements that exhibited good setting times, CS suitable for non-load-bearing applications and a full conversion to nanocrystalline CDHAp. Moreover, the ACP containing CPCs demonstrated good cell viability, making them suitable candidates for bone substitute materials. (C) 2009 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available