4.8 Article

Hierarchically structured titanium foams for tissue scaffold applications

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages 4596-4604

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.027

Keywords

Hierarchical titanium foams; Biomedical implants; Molten salt electrolysis; X-ray microtomography; Spinal fusion

Funding

  1. EC
  2. EPSRC [EP/E057098/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/T26344/01, EP/E057098/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a novel route for producing a new class of titanium foams for use in biomedical implant applications. These foams are hierarchically porous, with both the traditional large (>300 mu m) highly interconnected pores and, uniquely, wall struts also containing micron scale (0.5-5 mu m) interconnected porosities. The fabrication method consists of first producing a porous oxide precursor via a gel casting method, followed by electrochemical reduction to produce a metallic foam. This method offers the unique ability to tailor the porosity at several scales independently, unlike traditional space-holder techniques. Reducing the pressure during foam setting increased the macro-pore size. The intra-strut pore size (and percentage) can be controlled independently of macro-pore size by altering the ceramic loading and sintering temperature during precursor production. Typical properties for an 80% porous Ti foam were a modulus of similar to 1 GPa, a yield strength of 8 MPa and a permeability of 350 Darcies, all of which are in the range required for biomedical implant applications. We also demonstrate that the micron scale intra-strut porosities can be exploited to allow infiltration of bioactive materials using a novel bioactive silica-polymer composite, resulting in a metal-bioactive silica-polymer composite. (C) 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available