4.8 Article

Cell viability in a wet silica gel

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages 3478-3487

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.05.033

Keywords

Sol-gel; Silica; Encapsulation; Alkoxides; Hydrogels

Funding

  1. CICYT, Spain [MAT2008-00736]
  2. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain [P-MAT-000324-0505]
  3. Academy of Finland [114117]
  4. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (MEC)
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [114117, 114117] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A modified two-step sol-gel route using silicon ethoxide (TEOS) has been used to synthesize amorphous sol-gel-derived silica, which has been successfully used as a cell encapsulation matrix for 3T3 mouse fibroblasts and CRL-2595 epithelial cells due to its non-toxicity. The sol-gel procedure comprised a first, low pH hydrolysis step, followed by a neutral condensation-gelation step. A high water-to-TEOS ratio and the addition Of D-glucose as a porogen and source of nutrients were chosen to minimize silica dissolution and improve the biocompatibility of the process. Indeed, the cell integrity in the encapsulation process was preserved by alcohol removal from the starting solution. Cells were then added in a buffered medium, causing rapid gelation and entrapment of the cells within a randomly structured siloxane matrix in the shape of a monolith, which was maintained in the wet state. MTT and alamarBlue assays were used to check the cytotoxicity of the silica gels and the viability of entrapped cells at initial times in contact with silica. To improve cell attachment, cell clumping experiments - where groups of cells were formed - were designed, rendering improved viability. The obtained materials are therefore excellent candidates for designing tissue-culture scaffolds and implantable bioreactors for biomedical applications. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available