4.8 Article

Evaluation of adhesive properties of three resilient denture liners by the modified peel test method

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 764-769

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.021

Keywords

Adhesive properties; Denture base material; Resilient denture lining materials; Failure mode; Storage time

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The characteristics of adhesive properties between a denture base and resilient denture liner were investigated by a modified peel test with an L-shaped metal attachment. Three commercially resilient denture lining materials, namely GC Reline Soft (S), GC Reline Extra Soft (ES), and GC Reline Ultra Soft (US), were evaluated. Acrylic resin (GC Acron) was used as denture base material. Peel specimens consisting of the denture base acrylic resin and resilient denture liner were tested after storage for 1 and 30 days in distilled water at 37 degrees C. The modified peel test method gave load-displacement curves and work of adhesion (W(A)) values of the denture base material and resilient denture liner. The W(A) of specimens after 1 day of storage ranged from 1.71 to 2.55 N mm(-1) and increased in the order from US to S to ES. On the other hand, the W(A) of specimens after 30 day of storage ranged from 1.44 to 2.47 N mm(-1) and increased in the order from US to ES to S. US had significantly lower W(A) after 1 and 30 days of storage than did S and ES (P < 0.05). Comparison of the W(A) between 1 and 30 days, reveals large differences for ES and US, but not for S. This could be explained by the difference in failure modes. Within the limitations of this investigation, it was concluded the modified peel test is effective for evaluating the adhesion between denture base material and a resilient denture liner. @ 2008 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available