4.8 Article

In vivo testing of nanoparticle-treated TTCP/DCPA-based ceramic surfaces

Journal

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 1767-1774

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.12.002

Keywords

Bioresorption; Calcium phosphate; Histology; Implantation

Funding

  1. National Science Council of the Executive Yuan, Taiwan, China.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the development of a non-dispersive calcium phosphate cement (nd-CPC) paste containing tetracalcium phosphate and anhydrous dicalcium phosphate that can be used as a filling material in dental and orthopedic applications. The nd-CPC bone cement is compared with two commercial materials, OsteoSet (R) and Collagraft (R) bone grafts. Gross examination of retrieved implants/bone composite samples indicated that none of the implants in this study evoked an inflammatory response. The OsteoSet (R) (calcium sulfate) implant was resorbed too quickly to allow for osteo-remodeling, and it led to the formation of fibrous connective tissue in the fracture site, which remained even 24 weeks after implantation. Histological examination revealed that nd-CPC and Collagraft (R) (hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate/collagen) had greater remodeling and osteoconductive activity than OsteoSet (R) at both 12 and 24 weeks after implantation. Greater remodeling activities were found with nd-CPC cement than with the other materials at 12 weeks after implantation, and the Fourier transform infrared absorption band of carbonate or cellulose derivatives grew from 6 weeks to 24 weeks after implantation in nd-CPC cement. These findings show that nd-CPC compares favorably to commercial bone remodeling materials, and the fact that it is in a paste formulation makes it an ideal material to fill regeneration defects. Crown Copyright (c) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available