3.9 Article

CYLINDROSPERMOPSIN AND MICROCYSTIN-LR ALTER THE GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ACTIVITY OF WHITE MUSTARD (SINAPIS ALBA L.) SEEDLINGS, A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Journal

ACTA BIOLOGICA HUNGARICA
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 35-48

Publisher

AKADEMIAI KIADO ZRT
DOI: 10.1556/ABiol.61.2010.Suppl.5

Keywords

Cylindrospermopsin; Microcystin-LR; Sinapis alba L.; anthocyanin; POD

Categories

Funding

  1. Hungarian National Research Foundation [OTKA K81370]
  2. Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work focuses on the comparative analysis of the effects of two cyanobacterial toxins of different chemical structure cylindrospermopsin (CYN) and microcystin-LR (MC-LR) on the white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) seedlings. Both cyanotoxins reduced significantly the fresh mass and the length of cotyledons, hypocotyls and main roots of seedlings in a concentration dependent manner. For various mustard organs the 50% inhibitory concentration values (IC50) of growth were between 3-5 mu g ml(-1) for MC-LR and between 5-10 mu g ml(-1) for CYN, respectively. Cyanotoxins altered the development of cotyledons, the accumulation of photosynthetically active pigments and anthocyanins. Low MC-LR concentrations (0.01 and 0.1 mu g ml(-1)) stimulated anthocyanin formation in the cotyledons but higher than 1 mu g ml(-1) MC-LR concentrations strongly inhibited it. The CYN treated chlorotic cotyledons were violet coloured in consequence of high level of anthocyanins, while MC-LR induced chlorosis was accompanied by the appearance of necrotic patches. Necrosis and increases of peroxidase enzyme activity (POD) are general stress responses but these alterations were characteristic only for MC-LR treated mustard plants. These findings provide experimental evidences of developmental alterations induced by protein synthesis and protein phosphatase inhibitory cyanotoxins (CYN and MC-LR) in a model dicotyledonous plant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available