4.5 Article

DNA microarray analysis of fluconazole resistance in a laboratory Candida albicans strain

Journal

ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA
Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages 1048-1060

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00483.x

Keywords

Candida albicans; fluconazole; resistance; microarray

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several mechanisms are responsible for the acquired fluconazole (FLC) resistance in Candida albicans. In this study, we developed a FLC-resistant C. albicans strain through serial cultures of a FLC-susceptible C. albicans strain with inhibitory concentrations of FLC. Complimentary DNA microarray analysis and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were used to investigate gene expression changes during the acquisition of azole resistance in the susceptible parental strain and the resistant daughter strain. The differentially expressed genes represented functions as diverse as transporters (e.g. CDR1, PDR17), ergosterol biosynthesis (e.g. ERG2, ERG9), sterol metabolism (e.g. ARE2, IPF6464), energy metabolism (e.g. ADH3, AOX2) and transcription factors (e.g. FCR1, ECM22). Functional analysis revealed that energy-dependent efflux activity of membrane transporters increased and that ergosterol content decreased with the accumulation of sterol intermediates in the resistant strain as compared with the susceptible strain. We found that a point mutation (N977K) in transcription factor TAC1 that resulted in hyperactivity of Tac1 could be the reason for overexpression of CDR1, CDR2, and PDR17 in the resistant strain. Furthermore, a single amino acid difference (D19E) in ERG3 that led to the inactivation of Erg3 could account for both sterol precursor accumulation and the changes in the expression of ergosterol biosynthesis genes in this resistant strain. These findings expand the understanding of potential novel molecular targets of FLC resistance in clinical C. albicans isolates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available