4.6 Article

Simulation and control for telerobots in space medicine

Journal

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 390-402

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.06.010

Keywords

Control system; Human operator model; Robot model; Telesurgery; Time delay

Funding

  1. Hungarian NKTH OTKA [CK80316]
  2. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI [PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0109]
  3. Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  4. [TAMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR-2010-0002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human space exploration is continuously advancing despite the current financial difficulties, and the new missions are targeting the Moon and the Mars with more effective human-robot collaborative systems. The continuous development of robotic technology should lead to the advancement of automated technology, including space medicine. Telesurgery has already proved its effectiveness through various telemedicine procedures on Earth, and it has the potential to provide medical assistance in space as well. Aeronautical agencies have already conducted numerous experiments and developed various setups to push the boundaries of teleoperation under extreme conditions. Different control schemes have been proposed and tested to facilitate and enhance telepresence and to ensure transparency, sufficient bandwidth and latency-tolerance. This paper focuses on the modeling of a generic telesurgery setup, supported by a cascade control approach. The minimalistic models were tested with linear and MD-fuzzy control options to provide a simple, universal and scalable solution for the challenges of telesurgery over large distances. In our simulations, the control structures were capable of providing good dynamic performance indices and robustness with respect to the gain in the human operator model. This is a promising result towards the support of future teleoperational missions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available